Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VR-340
93 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR15 was released very close to the VR-340 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-ZR15 grades against the VR-340 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus VR-340. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus VR-340
| EX-ZR15 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| VR-340 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus VR-340
| EX-ZR15 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 | January 2012 | Same age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 features outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus VR-340 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the VR-340.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and VR-340 is 93 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and VR-340.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of images though you have to factor the age of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $249 | $130 |