Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax WG-10
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR15 and Pentax WG-10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WG-10 (14MP) is pretty similar and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR15 was unveiled 17 months before the WG-10 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-ZR15 grades against the WG-10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Pentax WG-10. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Pentax WG-10
EX-ZR15 | WG-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Casio EX-ZR15
WG-10 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2013 | January 2012 | More recent by 17 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Pentax WG-10
EX-ZR15 | WG-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR15 provides physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Pentax WG-10 has dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 and Pentax WG-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the WG-10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and WG-10 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by going over specs. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and WG-10.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR15 to offer you more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older EX-ZR15 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Pentax WG-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Pentax |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Pentax WG-10 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2013-06-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 0.7 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 1.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photos | 260 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $249 | $0 |