Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh CX3
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Ricoh CX3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR15 was brought out 20 months after the CX3 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the CX3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Ricoh CX3. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Ricoh CX3
| EX-ZR15 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| CX3 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Ricoh CX3
| EX-ZR15 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR15 and Ricoh CX3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the CX3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and CX3 is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and CX3.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR15 to give more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR15 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-110 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $249 | $329 |
