Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-30
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Ricoh WG-30, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is very comparable and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR15 was launched 3 years prior to the WG-30 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-ZR15 matches up versus the WG-30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Ricoh WG-30
EX-ZR15 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-ZR15
WG-30 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2014 | January 2012 | Fresher by 33 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Ricoh WG-30
EX-ZR15 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Ricoh WG-30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the WG-30.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and WG-30 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The photograph below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and WG-30.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution and you can expect comparable quality of pictures though you really should take the launch date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR15 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-01-09 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 192 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photos | 300 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $249 | $428 |