Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-50
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is very close and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR15 was announced 6 years before the WG-50 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR15 grades versus the WG-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Ricoh WG-50
EX-ZR15 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-ZR15
WG-50 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 65 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Ricoh WG-50
EX-ZR15 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 has physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the WG-50.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and WG-50 is 93 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and WG-50.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of images but you have to factor the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR15 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | 300 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $249 | $280 |