Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-70
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-80
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is very comparable and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR15 was brought out 9 years earlier than the WG-70 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR15 grades vs the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-ZR15 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| WG-70 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 98 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-ZR15 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR15 against the WG-70.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and WG-70 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The picture here should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and WG-70.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution and you should expect comparable quality of images however you should take the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR15 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Street photography info
Ricoh WG-70 Street photography info
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
built in image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR15
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-70
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
good battery (325 CIPA)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh WG-70 Travel photography highlights
good battery (325 per charge)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
good battery (325 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse function
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
manual mode not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR15
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-70
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no external microphone support
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $249 | $280 |
