Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15/Casio-EX-ZR15-front.jpg)
![Samsung DV300F front Samsung DV300F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-DV300F/Samsung-DV300F-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR15 was manufactured within a month of the DV300F which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR15 grades vs the DV300F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung DV300F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung DV300F
EX-ZR15 | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Casio EX-ZR15
DV300F | EX-ZR15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung DV300F
EX-ZR15 | DV300F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Same age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung DV300F has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR15 against the DV300F.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Samsung-DV300F-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and DV300F is 93 and 96 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Samsung-DV300F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The pic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and DV300F.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of files however you really should take the launch date of the cameras into account.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Samsung-DV300F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Samsung-DV300F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung DV300F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung DV300F |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-01-09 | 2012-01-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 4.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 pounds) | 133 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | BP88 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $249 | $200 |