Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung EX2F
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Revealed December 2012
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung EX2F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR15 was brought out 11 months prior to the EX2F so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-ZR15 grades vs the EX2F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung EX2F
| EX-ZR15 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 0k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-ZR15
| EX2F | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 11 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung EX2F
| EX-ZR15 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 has physical measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung EX2F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the EX2F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and EX2F is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading specs. The picture here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and EX2F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR15 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Casio EX-ZR15 will offer you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR15 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung EX2F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 pounds) | 294 grams (0.65 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $249 | $478 |