Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45935/45935cd57d74e35c1f19875df2e85c33ee5d58cd" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce26f/ce26f126ddb897ecf80630f38a706a60c1b9d696" alt="Samsung NX30 front Samsung NX30 front"
75 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 375g - 127 x 96 x 58mm
- Announced January 2014
- Older Model is Samsung NX20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung NX30, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the NX30 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and NX30 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The EX-ZR15 was manufactured 24 months before the NX30 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX30 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-ZR15 grades versus the NX30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Samsung NX30. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Samsung NX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung NX30
EX-ZR15 | NX30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX30 over the Casio EX-ZR15
NX30 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 24 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1036k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+575k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung NX30
EX-ZR15 | NX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 features exterior dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung NX30 has measurements of 127mm x 96mm x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") along with a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung NX30 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the NX30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7d12/c7d120f807126e97534f2bc0ceff50e897b5f468" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and NX30 is 93 and 75 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bf90/2bf90dbd8bd3003abe804b42a207524819c4b59d" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The photograph here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and NX30.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR15 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Samsung NX30 will give you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-ZR15 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7b1d/a7b1da3bce8dcef16f340e7750f37c771f1d8aa3" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c144/1c144533784877befe08fae5a0dbe9fcf99712ab" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung NX30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung NX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung NX30 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2014-01-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | DRIMeIV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 247 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 1,036k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.66x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 375 gr (0.83 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 127 x 96 x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1014 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | 360 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | BP1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $249 | $699 |