Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung SL202
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR15 was launched 2 years after the SL202 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 scores vs the SL202 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-ZR15 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| SL202 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung SL202
| EX-ZR15 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the SL202.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and SL202 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The pic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and SL202.
Plainly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR15 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR15 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung SL202 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-01-09 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $249 | $140 |