Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST30
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


98 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 87g - 82 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST30 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST30, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and ST30 (10MP) and the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and ST30 (1/3") have different sensor sizes.

The EX-ZR15 was announced 12 months later than the ST30 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR15 grades against the ST30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST30 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST30. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Samsung ST30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung ST30
EX-ZR15 | ST30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST30 over the Casio EX-ZR15
ST30 | EX-ZR15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST30
EX-ZR15 | ST30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST30 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST30 has proportions of 82mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 87 grams (0.19 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR15 against the ST30.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and ST30 is 93 and 98 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The visual underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and ST30.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR15 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Casio EX-ZR15 will offer you extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR15 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST30 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST30 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung ST30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung ST30 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 87 grams (0.19 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 82 x 52 x 17mm (3.2" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $249 | $55 |