Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST65
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung ST65, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR15 was brought out 12 months later than the ST65 and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-ZR15 scores against the ST65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung ST65
| EX-ZR15 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| ST65 | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST65
| EX-ZR15 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung ST65 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the ST65.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and ST65 is 93 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specifications. The graphic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and ST65.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR15 to show more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR15 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung ST65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $130 |