Clicky

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95

Portability
93
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front
 
Samsung ST95 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
19
Overall
31

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
  • Launched January 2012
Samsung ST95
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95 Overview

The following is a extended analysis of the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST95, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the ST95 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-ZR15 was introduced 12 months after the ST95 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-ZR15 matches up against the ST95 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung ST95

 EX-ZR15 ST95 
RevealedJanuary 2012January 2011Newer by 12 months
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen resolution461k460kCrisper screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Casio EX-ZR15

 ST95 EX-ZR15 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST95

 EX-ZR15 ST95 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 provides external dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST95 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the ST95.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and ST95 is 93 and 99 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and ST95.

As you can tell, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you may want to take the age of the products into consideration. The fresher EX-ZR15 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 Portrait photography details
Samsung ST95 Portrait photography details
40
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
features face detect autofocus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
30
good MP (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 as a Street photography camera
Samsung ST95 as a Street photography camera
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
50
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
low max ISO (0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 Sports photography info
Samsung ST95 Sports photography info
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
better than average battery pack (325 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
27
good MP (16MP)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR15
Travel photography with Samsung ST95
67
better than average battery pack (325 CIPA)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
no Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
71
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
good max aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung ST95 Landscape photography highlights
49
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (325 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse function
38
good max aperture (f)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good MP (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 Vlogging features
Samsung ST95 Vlogging features
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone jack
27
good max aperture (f)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung ST95
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR15Samsung ST95
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 Samsung ST95
Category Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Launched 2012-01-09 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 -
Min native ISO 80 -
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-196mm (7.0x) ()
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 2cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 461 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.20 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 176 grams (0.39 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 325 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-110 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $249 $145