Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL225
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Released August 2009
- Additionally referred to as ST550
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL225, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR15 was revealed 2 years after the TL225 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR15 scores versus the TL225 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung TL225. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung TL225
| EX-ZR15 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| TL225 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 461k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung TL225
| EX-ZR15 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 features external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL225 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR15 against the TL225.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and TL225 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and TL225.
As you can tell, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR15 to render extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR15 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung TL225 |
| Other name | - | ST550 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 187 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $488 |
