Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB150F
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
Samsung WB150F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB150F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR15 was manufactured at a similar time to the WB150F and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the WB150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-ZR15 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-ZR15
| WB150F | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-ZR15 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2012 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with exterior measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB150F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the WB150F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and WB150F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The image underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and WB150F.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR15 to give you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Portrait photography features
Samsung WB150F Portrait photography features
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
supports face detection autofocus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
focusing manually
good megapixels (14MP)
comes with face detection focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB150F Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (188g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Sports photography highlights
Samsung WB150F Sports photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery (325 per charge)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB150F as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery (325 shots)
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than average in class (188 grams)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (432mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Landscape photography features
Samsung WB150F Landscape photography features
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
better than average battery (325 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB150F as a Vlogging camera
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic socket
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than average in class (188g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-09 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 188 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $249 | $230 |