Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB210
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
Samsung WB210
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung WB210, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR15 was announced 6 months after the WB210 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 matches up vs the WB210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-ZR15 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| WB210 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB210
| EX-ZR15 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | July 2011 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 features exterior dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung WB210 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the WB210.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and WB210 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through specifications. The image underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and WB210.
To sum up, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR15 to produce greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR15
Portrait photography with Samsung WB210
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
provides face detection focusing
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Street photography advice
Samsung WB210 Street photography advice
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch to focus
lighter than average in class (174g)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB210 Sports photography advice
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
great battery power (325 CIPA)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB210 Travel photography advice
great battery power (325 per charge)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than average in class (174 grams)
supports touch to focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (288mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Landscape photography information
Samsung WB210 Landscape photography information
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
great battery power (325 CIPA)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
manual mode not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR15
Vlogging with Samsung WB210
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone port
relatively wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than average in class (174 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-09 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 174 gr (0.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $249 | $279 |
