Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB2200F
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung WB2200F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR15 was announced 24 months prior to the WB2200F making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZR15 grades against the WB2200F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung WB2200F
EX-ZR15 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-ZR15
WB2200F | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | January 2012 | More modern by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB2200F
EX-ZR15 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 has physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR15 against the WB2200F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and WB2200F is 93 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and WB2200F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos but you might want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR15 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB2200F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1/8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 708g (1.56 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-110 | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $249 | $599 |