Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB50F
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Announced January 2014
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB50F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WB50F (16MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR15 was revealed 24 months prior to the WB50F which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 matches up versus the WB50F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung WB50F
EX-ZR15 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Casio EX-ZR15
WB50F | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | January 2012 | Newer by 24 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB50F
EX-ZR15 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the WB50F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and WB50F is 93 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The image here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and WB50F.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures although you would want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more aged EX-ZR15 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB50F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-01-09 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 207 grams (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-110 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $249 | $180 |