Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB700
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed December 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB700, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR15 was brought out 13 months after the WB700 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR15 grades against the WB700 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB700. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung WB700
| EX-ZR15 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | December 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| WB700 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB700
| EX-ZR15 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR15 features external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB700 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the WB700.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and WB700 is 93 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The image here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and WB700.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR15 to offer you extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR15 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB700 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 gr (0.39 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $249 | $300 |