Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45935/45935cd57d74e35c1f19875df2e85c33ee5d58cd" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15418/15418ee0968ee6e7d25e3170c052632adc898e25" alt="Samsung WB850F front Samsung WB850F front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Announced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung WB850F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is pretty similar and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The EX-ZR15 was revealed at a similar time to the WB850F and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-ZR15 matches up against the WB850F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung WB850F. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung WB850F
EX-ZR15 | WB850F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Casio EX-ZR15
WB850F | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper screen (+153k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB850F
EX-ZR15 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | Similar age |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the WB850F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/172bc/172bcd8881c2c1b3f2c1aacce5e9731efd041d15" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and WB850F is 93 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d3d0/6d3d0989d595ce2a318f535b6ecdb1c72c387370" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR15 and WB850F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels and you can expect similar quality of photographs although you will want to consider the age of the products into consideration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59fa6/59fa65038841baf0740906831e674b1ae059118c" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31a94/31a94764ee8a0f33d7c3d3f74dc94be11e7de819" alt="Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB850F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-01-09 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 250 gr (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $249 | $599 |