Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is fairly well matched but the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.

The EX-ZR15 was unveiled 3 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR15 scores against the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-ZR15 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-ZR15
DP2 Quattro | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 25 months |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
EX-ZR15 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR15 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR15 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 395g (0.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-110 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $249 | $931 |