Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15/Casio-EX-ZR15-front.jpg)
![Sigma SD1 Merrill front Sigma SD1 Merrill front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Sigma-SD1-Merrill-ek-fs.jpg)
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Announced April 2012
- Superseded the Sigma SD1
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Lets look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) come with different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR15 was launched 3 months before the SD1 Merrill and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR15 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-ZR15 scores against the SD1 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-ZR15 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Casio EX-ZR15
SD1 Merrill | EX-ZR15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-ZR15 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | April 2012 | Same generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 has got outer dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has measurements of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Sigma SD1 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR15 compared to the SD1 Merrill.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Sigma-SD1-Merrill-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and SD1 Merrill is 93 and 57 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Sigma-SD1-Merrill-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The graphic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and SD1 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR15 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-ZR15 will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Sigma-SD1-Merrill-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Sigma-SD1-Merrill-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lb) | 790 gr (1.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $249 | $2,339 |