Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony WX300
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2012
Sony WX300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Launched February 2013
- Successor is Sony WX350
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony WX300 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Casio EX-ZR15 and Sony WX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WX300 (18MP) is relatively close and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR15 was unveiled 13 months before the WX300 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR15 matches up versus the WX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony WX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Sony WX300
| EX-ZR15 | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Casio EX-ZR15
| WX300 | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 13 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Sony WX300
| EX-ZR15 | WX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with exterior dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Sony WX300 has proportions of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR15 and Sony WX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the WX300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and WX300 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and WX300.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sony WX300 to render extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR15 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Portrait photography features
Sony WX300 Portrait photography features
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR15
Street photography with Sony WX300
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (166g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Sports photography info
Sony WX300 Sports photography info
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (325 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX300 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery life (325 shots)
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competitors (166 grams)
megapixel count good (18MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
long reach (500mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Landscape photography factors
Sony WX300 Landscape photography factors
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
better than average battery life (325 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
relatively wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Vlogging info
Sony WX300 Vlogging info
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (166g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
does not have microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Sony WX300 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-09 | 2013-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 166g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $249 | $330 |
