Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Portability
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
FujiFilm JV200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix JV205
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR300 and FujiFilm JV200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the JV200 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR300 was unveiled 17 months later than the JV200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR300 grades versus the JV200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & FujiFilm FinePix JV200. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & FujiFilm JV200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the FujiFilm JV200
| EX-ZR300 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 17 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| JV200 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and FujiFilm JV200
| EX-ZR300 | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the FujiFilm JV200 has measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR300 and FujiFilm JV200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the JV200.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and JV200 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through specs. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and JV200.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography advice
FujiFilm JV200 Portrait photography advice
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
decent MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography features
FujiFilm JV200 Street photography features
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography info
FujiFilm JV200 Sports photography info
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
has tracking focus
better than average battery power (500 shots)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
decent MP (14MP)
supports tracking focus
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low battery pack (180 per charge)
no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography highlights
FujiFilm JV200 Travel photography highlights
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (205g)
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low battery pack (180 per charge)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography features
FujiFilm JV200 Landscape photography features
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
low battery pack (180 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging details
FujiFilm JV200 Vlogging details
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (205 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
lighter than competition in class (125g)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 |
| Alternate name | - | FinePix JV205 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 125g (0.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 180 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $329 | $49 |