Clicky

Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200

Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front
 
FujiFilm FinePix JV200 front
Portability
96 Imaging
36 Features
18 Overall
28

Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Revealed May 2012
FujiFilm JV200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2011
  • Additionally Known as FinePix JV205
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Casio EX-ZR300 and FujiFilm JV200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the JV200 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-ZR300 was unveiled 17 months later than the JV200 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR300 grades versus the JV200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images 

        

          

            
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the FujiFilm JV200

          

          

            
 EX-ZR300 JV200 
IntroducedMay 2012January 2011More recent by 17 months
Focus manually  Dial accurate focus
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kClearer screen (+231k dot)
          

        


        

          

            
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Casio EX-ZR300

          

          

            
 JV200 EX-ZR300 
          

        


        

          

            
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and FujiFilm JV200

          

          

            
 EX-ZR300 JV200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen  Neither features Touch friendly screen
          

        

        

	
	
	
	

        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Physical Comparison

          

          

            
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the FujiFilm JV200 has measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR300 and FujiFilm JV200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the JV200.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 size comparison
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and JV200 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 top view buttons comparison          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Sensor Comparison

          

          

            
Often, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through specs. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and JV200.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

            Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 sensor size comparison
          

        


        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Screen and ViewFinder

          

          

                      

          Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison        


                President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        

	
	
	
	

        

          
Photography Type Scores

          

        

        
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography advice
FujiFilm JV200 Portrait photography advice
39
 manual focus
 resolution is good (16MP)
 cannot use external flash
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
28
 decent MP (14MP)
 focusing manually not possible
 lack of manual exposure
 external flash not possible
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Street Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography features
FujiFilm JV200 Street photography features
62
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average in class (205 grams)
 screen is fixed
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
55
 lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
 screen is fixed
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography info
FujiFilm JV200 Sports photography info
55
 amazing zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 resolution is good (16MP)
 has tracking focus
 better than average battery power (500 shots)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have phase detect autofocus
29
 decent MP (14MP)
 supports tracking focus
 low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
 painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
 no shutter priority
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 low battery pack (180 per charge)
 no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography highlights
FujiFilm JV200 Travel photography highlights
71
 better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
 lighter than average in class (205g)
 resolution is good (16MP)
 flash built-in
 decently wide (24mm)
 great reach (300mm)
 does not have Timelapse recording
 display is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
60
 lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
 decent MP (14MP)
 has built in flash
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
 low battery pack (180 per charge)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 wide angle not the best (36mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.1)
Photography Glossary
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography features
FujiFilm JV200 Landscape photography features
52
 manual focus
 decently wide (24mm)
 screen size is good (3 inches)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 resolution is good (16MP)
 better than average battery power (500 CIPA)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 sensor  is small (1/2.3")
 doesn't have RAW files
 does not have Timelapse recording
28
 decent MP (14 megapixels)
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not the best (36mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.1)
 screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
 lack of manual exposure
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor size is small (1/2.3")
 no RAW files
 low battery pack (180 CIPA)
 doesn't have Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging details
FujiFilm JV200 Vlogging details
33
 decently wide (24mm)
 image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than average in class (205 grams)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 display is not selfie friendly
 does not have microphone socket
25
 lighter than competition in class (125g)
 wide angle not the best (36mm)
 slow max aperture (f3.1)
 does not have selfie friendly screen
 does not have image stabilization
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 doesn't have mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
        
                
        

          

            
Casio EX-ZR300 vs FujiFilm JV200 Specifications

          

          

                      


          

            Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR300 and FujiFilm JV200
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR300FujiFilm FinePix JV200
General Information
Company Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 FujiFilm FinePix JV200
Alternate name - FinePix JV205
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-05-22 2011-01-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO - 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW data    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Single autofocus    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 36-108mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.1-5.6
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch display    
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
Auto exposure bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 205g (0.45 lb) 125g (0.28 lb)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos 180 photos
Battery format Battery Pack AA
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD / SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $329 $49