Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Released April 2009
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm F200EXR, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") enjoy different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR300 was unveiled 3 years later than the Fujifilm F200EXR and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR300 grades against the Fujifilm F200EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2012 | April 2009 | More recent by 38 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-ZR300
Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm F200EXR
EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F200EXR has specifications of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm F200EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the Fujifilm F200EXR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The photograph here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR300 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR300 will result in more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR300 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-05-22 | 2009-04-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $329 | $350 |