Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e75f/3e75f97ec72a6b6432f81acd12a383eebb151e04" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49e87/49e87370fa49dea2e26560662d9ff1039089e86f" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front"
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The EX-ZR300 was revealed 2 years later than the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR300 matches up against the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 35 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Casio EX-ZR300
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1
EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 features external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") and a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9dd9/b9dd9571ac8779dfc48e523ae7b04be591b56e84" alt="Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 size comparison Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is 92 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9be18/9be182ac1e751f17b180a258bac9ca95400160df" alt="Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR300 to result in more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR300 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efba0/efba0aab069c464b1d2cc69d0aa98e41f6a49c57" alt="Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d85f2/d85f2aca1acf9801127358efda3337786154485c" alt="Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | RP (Real Photo) 3D |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.7-4.2 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.8 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 1/4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 260g (0.57 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-95 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $329 | $900 |