Clicky

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1

Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 front
Portability
90 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Launched May 2012
Fujifilm Real 3D W1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
  • Released July 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Overview

Below is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The EX-ZR300 was revealed 2 years later than the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR300 matches up against the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1

		

		

			
 EX-ZR300 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 
ReleasedMay 2012July 2009More recent by 35 months
Focus manually  Dial precise focus
Display sizing3"2.8"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution461k230kClearer display (+231k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Casio EX-ZR300

		

		

			
 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 EX-ZR300 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1

		

		

			
 EX-ZR300 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither includes Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 features external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 has measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") and a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 size comparison
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR300 to result in more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR300 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
	
			Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography advice
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Portrait photography advice
40
 focusing manually
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 cannot use external flash
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
19
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 no external flash support
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
Photography Glossary
Street Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR300 as a Street photography camera
 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 as a Street photography camera
62
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average in class (205 grams)
 no articulating screen
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
45
 screen does not articulate
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
 more heavy than others in class (260 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR300 as a Sports photography camera
 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 as a Sports photography camera
55
 great zoom range (24-300mm  12.5 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 supports tracking autofocus
 great battery power (500 per charge)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect autofocus
16
 low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
 no shutter priority
 lack of image stabilization
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Travel photography with Fujifilm Real 3D W1
71
 great battery power (500 per charge)
 lighter than average in class (205g)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 built-in flash
 really wide (24mm)
 long reach (300mm)
 lack of Time Lapse recording
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
48
 has built in flash
 no Timelapse recording
 more heavy than others in class (260g)
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 wide angle not the best (35mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Landscape Comparison
 Casio EX-ZR300 as a Landscape photography camera
 Fujifilm Real 3D W1 as a Landscape photography camera
52
 focusing manually
 really wide (24mm)
 decent sized screen (3 inches)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 great battery power (500 shots)
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 lack of Time Lapse recording
26
 decent sized screen (2.8 inches)
 no manual focus
 can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not the best (35mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
 no manual control
 lack of image stabilization
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
 has no RAW files
 no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR300
Vlogging with Fujifilm Real 3D W1
33
 really wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than average in class (205 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 lack of external mic port
21
 wide angle not the best (35mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
 doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
 lack of image stabilization
 video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
 no external microphone jack
 more heavy than others in class (260 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	

		

			
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm Real 3D W1
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR300Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1
General Information
Company Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-05-22 2009-07-22
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS RP (Real Photo) 3D
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
Touch to focus    
AF continuous    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
AF live view    
Face detection focusing    
Contract detection focusing    
Phase detection focusing    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.7-4.2
Macro focusing distance 1cm 8cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.8 inches
Resolution of screen 461k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 1/4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1000s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Built-in flash    
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 205g (0.45 lb) 260g (0.57 lb)
Dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 NP-95
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $329 $900