Clicky

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
50
Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD front
Portability
75
Imaging
33
Features
22
Overall
28

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced May 2012
Fujifilm S2000HD
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-414mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
  • 426g - 111 x 79 x 76mm
  • Launched January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Overview

The following is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Fujifilm S2000HD, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and FujiFilm. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and Fujifilm S2000HD (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The EX-ZR300 was unveiled 3 years after the Fujifilm S2000HD which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S2000HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR300 matches up against the Fujifilm S2000HD in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Fujifilm S2000HD

 EX-ZR300 Fujifilm S2000HD 
LaunchedMay 2012January 2009Newer by 41 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kCrisper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S2000HD over the Casio EX-ZR300

 Fujifilm S2000HD EX-ZR300 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm S2000HD

 EX-ZR300 Fujifilm S2000HD 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 offers external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Fujifilm S2000HD has sizing of 111mm x 79mm x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Fujifilm S2000HD in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the Fujifilm S2000HD.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm S2000HD is 92 and 75 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm S2000HD.

Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to offer greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR300 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography info
Fujifilm S2000HD Portrait photography info
39
manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
27
manual focus
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography highlights
Fujifilm S2000HD Street photography highlights
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
38
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography information
Fujifilm S2000HD Sports photography information
55
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
has tracking focus
great battery power (500 per charge)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
23
excellent zoom range (28-414mm 14.8 x zoom)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000s)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography details
Fujifilm S2000HD Travel photography details
71
great battery power (500 shots)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
missing Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
53
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
very long reach (414mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Landscape photography with Fujifilm S2000HD
52
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
great battery power (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
30
manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging details
Fujifilm S2000HD Vlogging details
33
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone jack
21
relatively wide (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S2000HD Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm S2000HD
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR300Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD
General Information
Brand Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 Fujifilm FinePix S2000HD
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2012-05-22 2009-01-15
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-414mm (14.8x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.4
Macro focusing range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 461k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 8.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205g (0.45 lb) 426g (0.94 lb)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 111 x 79 x 76mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $329 $280