Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S4800
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Portability
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S4800 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
Fujifilm S4800
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-720mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 518g - 122 x 93 x 100mm
- Released January 2013
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S4800 Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Fujifilm S4800, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the Fujifilm S4800 (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR300 was manufactured 8 months prior to the Fujifilm S4800 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Fujifilm S4800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR300 grades vs the Fujifilm S4800 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S4800 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Fujifilm FinePix S4800. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Fujifilm S4800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Fujifilm S4800
| EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm S4800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4800 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| Fujifilm S4800 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | May 2012 | More modern by 8 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm S4800
| EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm S4800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S4800 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Fujifilm S4800 has proportions of 122mm x 93mm x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") and a weight of 518 grams (1.14 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Fujifilm S4800 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the Fujifilm S4800.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm S4800 is 92 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S4800 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The picture below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm S4800.
All in all, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photographs however you should always consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S4800 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm S4800 as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
resolution is good (16MP)
supports face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography features
Fujifilm S4800 Street photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than competition (518g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography advice
Fujifilm S4800 Sports photography advice
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
great battery life (500 per charge)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography details
Fujifilm S4800 Travel photography details
great battery life (500 per charge)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (720mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (518 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Landscape photography camera
Fujifilm S4800 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
great battery life (500 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse function
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging highlights
Fujifilm S4800 Vlogging highlights
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone port
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competition (518g)
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S4800 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm FinePix S4800 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2013-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 518 gr (1.14 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 93 x 100mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $229 |