Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S8100fd
92 Imaging
38 Features
50 Overall
42
75 Imaging
32 Features
26 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S8100fd Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 405g - 111 x 78 x 79mm
- Released January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S8100fd Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S8100fd, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and FujiFilm. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and Fujifilm S8100fd (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR300 was launched 3 years later than the Fujifilm S8100fd and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the Fujifilm S8100fd when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S8100fd Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Fujifilm S8100fd Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Fujifilm S8100fd
| EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm S8100fd | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2012 | January 2009 | More recent by 41 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S8100fd over the Casio EX-ZR300
| Fujifilm S8100fd | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm S8100fd
| EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm S8100fd | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S8100fd Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S8100fd has dimensions of 111mm x 78mm x 79mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.1") having a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S8100fd in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the Fujifilm S8100fd.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm S8100fd is 92 and 75 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S8100fd Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm S8100fd.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S8100fd Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm S8100fd Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm FinePix S8100fd |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.80 m (Auto ISO (800)) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 30 fps, 320 x 240 30 fps |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 405 gr (0.89 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 78 x 79mm (4.4" x 3.1" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC/MMC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $300 |