Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm XP200
Portability
92 Imaging
38 Features
50 Overall
42
92 Imaging
38 Features
50 Overall
42
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm XP200 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
Fujifilm XP200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Revealed March 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm XP200 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm XP200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR300 was announced 10 months prior to the Fujifilm XP200 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR300 matches up against the Fujifilm XP200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm XP200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Fujifilm FinePix XP200. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Fujifilm XP200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Fujifilm XP200
| EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| Fujifilm XP200 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 |  | May 2012 | Fresher by 10 months |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm XP200
| EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm XP200 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 features external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Fujifilm XP200 has sizing of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm XP200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the Fujifilm XP200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm XP200 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm XP200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and Fujifilm XP200.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you should consider the age of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm XP200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm XP200 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography info
Fujifilm XP200 Street photography info
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography highlights
Fujifilm XP200 Sports photography highlights
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
great battery power (500 CIPA)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Travel photography with Fujifilm XP200
great battery power (500 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography advice
Fujifilm XP200 Landscape photography advice
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
great battery power (500 CIPA)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
environment sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging highlights
Fujifilm XP200 Vlogging highlights
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone jack
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Fujifilm XP200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2013-03-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $329 | $250 |