Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C135
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C135 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak C135, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the C135 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR300 was revealed 5 months after the C135 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the C135 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Kodak EasyShare C135. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Kodak C135
| EX-ZR300 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+349k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| C135 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak C135
| EX-ZR300 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | January 2012 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 has outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak C135 has proportions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak C135 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the C135.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and C135 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by going through specifications. The image here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and C135.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR300 to provide extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.4 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 112k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $329 | $0 |