Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C140
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C140 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C140 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C140, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Kodak. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and C140 (8MP) and the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and C140 (1/2.5") offer different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR300 was revealed 3 years after the C140 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the C140 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C140 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Kodak EasyShare C140. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Kodak C140 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Kodak C140
| EX-ZR300 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 41 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| C140 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak C140
| EX-ZR300 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C140 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 provides exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak C140 has sizing of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C140 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the C140.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and C140 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C140 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The image here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and C140.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-ZR300 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-ZR300 will give greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR300 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C140 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak C140 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak EasyShare C140 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak EasyShare C140 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 8 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.7-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 13cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $329 | $80 |