Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak M580
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
90 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak M580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Revealed July 2009
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak M580 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak M580, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the M580 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR300 was manufactured 2 years later than the M580 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the M580 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak M580 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Kodak EasyShare M580. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Kodak M580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Kodak M580
EX-ZR300 | M580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2012 | July 2009 | Fresher by 35 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Casio EX-ZR300
M580 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak M580
EX-ZR300 | M580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak M580 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 offers exterior measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Kodak M580 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak M580 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the M580.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and M580 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak M580 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and M580.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR300 to result in greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR300 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak M580 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak M580 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak EasyShare M580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak EasyShare M580 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-05-22 | 2009-07-29 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 150g (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $329 | $169 |