Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
95 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak Easyshare M5370, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the Easyshare M5370 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR300 was announced 9 months after the Easyshare M5370 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR300 grades versus the Easyshare M5370 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Kodak Easyshare M5370. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| EX-ZR300 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2012 | September 2011 | Newer by 9 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| Easyshare M5370 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak Easyshare M5370
| EX-ZR300 | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 features outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 and Kodak Easyshare M5370 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the Easyshare M5370.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and Easyshare M5370 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The image here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and Easyshare M5370.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution and you should expect similar quality of photos but you should always take the production date of the products into consideration. The more modern EX-ZR300 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Kodak |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2011-09-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-1, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 150 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $329 | $160 |