Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon P950
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon P950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Revealed January 2020
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon P950 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Nikon P950, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the P950 (16MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR300 was introduced 8 years earlier than the P950 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the P950 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon P950 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Nikon Coolpix P950. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Nikon P950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Nikon P950
EX-ZR300 | P950 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Casio EX-ZR300
P950 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2020 | May 2012 | Fresher by 92 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 461k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Nikon P950
EX-ZR300 | P950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon P950 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Nikon P950 has sizing of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") having a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Nikon P950 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the P950.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and P950 is 92 and 52 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon P950 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by going through specifications. The graphic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and P950.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures but you will need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon P950 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Nikon P950 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Nikon Coolpix P950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2020-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-2000mm (83.3x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 90% |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 300 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 1005 gr (2.22 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 290 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $329 | $797 |