Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-4030
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
95 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Announced January 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-4030, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the FE-4030 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR300 was introduced 2 years after the FE-4030 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the FE-4030 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Olympus FE-4030. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Olympus FE-4030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus FE-4030
| EX-ZR300 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 29 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| FE-4030 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus FE-4030
| EX-ZR300 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 has got external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4030 has specifications of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-4030 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the FE-4030.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and FE-4030 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through specifications. The pic below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and FE-4030.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR300 to give extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR300 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus FE-4030 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus FE-4030 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-05-22 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 146g (0.32 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $329 | $130 |
