Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-45
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 62 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-45 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus FE-45, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and FE-45 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR300 was revealed 3 years after the FE-45 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-ZR300 scores versus the FE-45 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-45 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Olympus FE-45. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Olympus FE-45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus FE-45
| EX-ZR300 | FE-45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-45 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| FE-45 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus FE-45
| EX-ZR300 | FE-45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-45 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 enjoys outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus FE-45 has specifications of 94mm x 62mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus FE-45 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the FE-45.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and FE-45 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-45 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and FE-45.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR300 to deliver greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR300 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-45 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-45 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus FE-45 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus FE-45 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-05-22 | 2009-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 142g (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 62 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $130 |