Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-47
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
93 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-47 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 204g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-47 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus FE-47, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the FE-47 (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR300 was introduced 2 years after the FE-47 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR300 grades against the FE-47 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-47 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Olympus FE-47. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Olympus FE-47 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus FE-47
| EX-ZR300 | FE-47 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 29 months | |
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-47 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| FE-47 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus FE-47
| EX-ZR300 | FE-47 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-47 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 has physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-47 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus FE-47 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the FE-47.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and FE-47 is 92 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-47 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The picture here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and FE-47.
All in all, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR300 to deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR300 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-47 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-47 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus FE-47 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus FE-47 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 204g (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $329 | $0 |