Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5020
92 Imaging
38 Features
50 Overall
42
95 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-935
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus FE-5020, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe EX-ZR300 was announced 2 years later than the FE-5020 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the EX-ZR300 scores against the FE-5020 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Olympus FE-5020. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus FE-5020
| EX-ZR300 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2012 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 35 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| FE-5020 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus FE-5020
| EX-ZR300 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 offers physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus FE-5020 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR300 vs the FE-5020.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and FE-5020 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The visual here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and FE-5020.
All in all, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR300 to deliver extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR300 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus FE-5020 |
| Also called | - | X-935 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 137g (0.30 lb) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $329 | $160 |