Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR300 was announced 3 years after the SP-565UZ which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-ZR300 matches up vs the SP-565UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Olympus SP-565UZ. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| EX-ZR300 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 41 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Casio EX-ZR300
| SP-565UZ | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus SP-565UZ
| EX-ZR300 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 offers external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the SP-565UZ.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and SP-565UZ is 92 and 72 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to offer you extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR300 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2009-01-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $329 | $400 |