Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SZ-10
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Portability
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
90 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SZ-10 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
Olympus SZ-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-4.4) lens
- 215g - 106 x 67 x 38mm
- Launched February 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SZ-10 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus SZ-10, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the SZ-10 (14MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR300 was unveiled 16 months after the SZ-10 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the SZ-10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SZ-10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Olympus SZ-10. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Olympus SZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus SZ-10
| EX-ZR300 | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | February 2011 | Newer by 16 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-10 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| SZ-10 | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus SZ-10
| EX-ZR300 | SZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 has got physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-10 has measurements of 106mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus SZ-10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the SZ-10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and SZ-10 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and SZ-10.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR300 to give extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR300 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SZ-10 Portrait photography highlights
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography highlights
Olympus SZ-10 Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (215g)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography highlights
Olympus SZ-10 Sports photography highlights
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
good battery power (500 per charge)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
excellent zoom range (28-504mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (220 shots)
has no phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography details
Olympus SZ-10 Travel photography details
good battery power (500 per charge)
lighter than competition (205g)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competitors in class (215 grams)
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
very long reach (504mm)
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery (220 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Landscape photography with Olympus SZ-10
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good battery power (500 per charge)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
really wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery (220 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR300
Vlogging with Olympus SZ-10
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (205 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic socket
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
lighter than competitors in class (215g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SZ-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus SZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus SZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-504mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-4.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 7.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 215 grams (0.47 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 106 x 67 x 38mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 220 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $329 | $300 |