Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7010
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


94 Imaging
34 Features
18 Overall
27
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 145g - 98 x 56 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Other Name is mju 7010

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7010 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus 7010, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and 7010 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR300 was launched 2 years after the 7010 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR300 scores versus the 7010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7010 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Olympus Stylus 7010. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Olympus 7010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus 7010
EX-ZR300 | 7010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 35 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7010 over the Casio EX-ZR300
7010 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus 7010
EX-ZR300 | 7010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7010 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 has external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7010 has measurements of 98mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus 7010 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the 7010.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and 7010 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7010 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR300 and 7010.
Plainly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR300 to render more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR300 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7010 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7010 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Stylus 7010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Stylus 7010 |
Also called as | - | mju 7010 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 pounds) | 145g (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 56 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $329 | $200 |