Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7030
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju 7030
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7030 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus 7030, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the 7030 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR300 was unveiled 2 years after the 7030 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR300 scores versus the 7030 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7030 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Olympus Stylus 7030. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Olympus 7030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus 7030
EX-ZR300 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 29 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Casio EX-ZR300
7030 | EX-ZR300 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus 7030
EX-ZR300 | 7030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7030 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 offers outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7030 has specifications of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR300 versus Olympus 7030 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the 7030.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and 7030 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7030 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The picture underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and 7030.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR300 to provide extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR300 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7030 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 7030 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Stylus 7030 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Stylus 7030 |
Also referred to as | - | mju 7030 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9 and 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 gr (0.45 lb) | 140 gr (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $329 | $179 |