Clicky

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
50
Overall
43
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Announced May 2012
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Also referred to as mju 9000
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus 9000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-ZR300 was announced 3 years after the 9000 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR300 scores versus the 9000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus 9000

 EX-ZR300 9000 
AnnouncedMay 2012May 2009More modern by 37 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution461k230kSharper screen (+231k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Casio EX-ZR300

 9000 EX-ZR300 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus 9000

 EX-ZR300 9000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 comes with outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus 9000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the 9000.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and 9000 is 92 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The picture here will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR300 and 9000.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR300 to produce greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR300 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography info
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography info
39
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
21
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography features
Olympus 9000 Street photography features
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (205g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competitors in class (225 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography advice
Olympus 9000 Sports photography advice
55
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
good battery power (500 shots)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Travel photography with Olympus 9000
71
good battery power (500 shots)
lighter than others (205g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
58
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long zoom (280mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (225g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
52
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
good battery power (500 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 Vlogging information
Olympus 9000 Vlogging information
33
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (205 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic support
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than competitors in class (225 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus 9000
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR300Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Company Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 Olympus Stylus 9000
Also Known as - mju 9000
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2012-05-22 2009-05-14
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine HS -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 80 50
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 461 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 205g (0.45 pounds) 225g (0.50 pounds)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $329 $300