Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SH-2
92 Imaging
38 Features
50 Overall
42
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Replaced the Olympus SH-1
- Refreshed by Olympus SH-3
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus SH-2, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR300 was introduced 3 years before the SH-2 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR300 scores vs the SH-2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus SH-2
| EX-ZR300 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Casio EX-ZR300
| SH-2 | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2015 | May 2012 | More recent by 34 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus SH-2
| EX-ZR300 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 enjoys outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus SH-2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the SH-2.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and SH-2 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and SH-2.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same resolution and you should expect comparable quality of files but you should always take the release date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-05-22 | 2015-03-11 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 11.5 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 380 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $329 | $399 |