Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
Portability
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Portability
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Announced August 2012
- Replaced the Olympus SP-820UZ
- Updated by Olympus SP-820UZ
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-820UZ, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is very similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR300 was launched 3 months before the SP-820UZ which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-ZR300 matches up against the SP-820UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 & Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery & Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| EX-ZR300 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Casio EX-ZR300
| SP-820UZ | EX-ZR300 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus SP-820UZ
| EX-ZR300 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | August 2012 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 has outside measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus SP-820UZ has proportions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-820UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the SP-820UZ.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and SP-820UZ is 92 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and SP-820UZ.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR300 to offer extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SP-820UZ Portrait photography highlights
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
MP count decent (14MP)
offers face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Street photography with Olympus SP-820UZ
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (205g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (485g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SP-820UZ as a Sports photography camera
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
includes tracking focus
better than average battery (500 shots)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
great zoom range (22-896mm 40.7 x zoom)
MP count decent (14MP)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography highlights
Olympus SP-820UZ Travel photography highlights
better than average battery (500 shots)
lighter than competitors (205g)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (22mm)
great zoom (896mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (485 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SP-820UZ as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
better than average battery (500 CIPA)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
really wide (22mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR300
Vlogging with Olympus SP-820UZ
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (205 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
lack of microphone jack
really wide (22mm)
offers face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing external mic support
heavier than competitors in class (485 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.4-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 15.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 485 gr (1.07 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $329 | $299 |
