Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-5
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Updated by Olympus TG-6

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus TG-5, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and TG-5 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR300 was manufactured 6 years prior to the TG-5 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-ZR300 matches up versus the TG-5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Olympus Tough TG-5. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Olympus TG-5
EX-ZR300 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Casio EX-ZR300
TG-5 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2017 | ![]() | May 2012 | Newer by 60 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus TG-5
EX-ZR300 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR300 enjoys physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus TG-5 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR300 and Olympus TG-5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR300 against the TG-5.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR300 and TG-5 is 92 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The picture below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and TG-5.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-ZR300 to result in greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR300 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2012-05-22 | 2017-05-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 250g (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 340 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $329 | $449 |