Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Updated by Ricoh GR II

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Overview
The following is a complete review of the Casio EX-ZR300 and Ricoh GR, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the GR (16MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) use different sensor sizing.

The EX-ZR300 was introduced 11 months before the GR which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-ZR300 scores versus the GR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Ricoh GR. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Ricoh GR
EX-ZR300 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-ZR300
GR | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2013 | ![]() | May 2012 | Newer by 11 months |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Ricoh GR
EX-ZR300 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR300 provides outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has sizing of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR300 and Ricoh GR in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the GR.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and GR is 92 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The picture here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and GR.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR300 provides the smaller sensor which should make getting bokeh more challenging. The more aged EX-ZR300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Ricoh GR |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-05-22 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 300 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205g (0.45 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 290 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $329 | $971 |