Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") have totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR300 was revealed 2 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR300 grades versus the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-ZR300 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2012 | July 2009 | Newer by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Casio EX-ZR300
GR Digital III | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-ZR300 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 provides outer dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR300 and the GR Digital III.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR300 and GR Digital III is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The picture below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and GR Digital III.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR300 with its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Casio EX-ZR300 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger EX-ZR300 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2012-05-22 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lb) | 208 grams (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $329 | $399 |