Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
92 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched August 2011
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the EX-ZR300 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR300 was launched 10 months later than the GXR Mount A12 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR300 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-ZR300 grades against the GXR Mount A12 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-ZR300 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | August 2011 | More recent by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-ZR300
GXR Mount A12 | EX-ZR300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-ZR300 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR300 has got outer measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR300 versus the GXR Mount A12.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and GXR Mount A12 is 92 and 84 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements only by reading a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR300 and GXR Mount A12.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR300 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Casio EX-ZR300 will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR300 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-05-22 | 2011-08-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/9000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 9.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | 370 grams (0.82 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 330 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $329 | $349 |